Re: issue with synchronized_standby_slots

[Shlok Kyal]

On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 at 09:36, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 10:53 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 9:05 PM Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636...@gmail.com> 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > As Ashutosh suggests I will go more for the backpatching approach because 
> > > the synchronized_standby_slots parameter impacts the last 2 major 
> > > versions and this problem is critical on production environments.
> > >
> >
> > Fair enough. Let's wait for the related issue being discussed in email
> > [1] to be fixed.
> >
>
> As the other patch is committed
> (f33e60a53a9ca89b5078df49416acae20affe1f5), can you update and prepare
> backbranch patches for this fix as well?
>
Hi Amit,

Please find the updated patch.

v6-0001 : It applies on HEAD and REL_18_STABLE branches
v6_REL_17-0001 : It applies on REL_17_STABLE branch.

Since this GUC was introduced in PG_17, we do not need to back-patch
to PG_16 or prior.

Thanks,
Shlok Kyal

v6_REL_17-0001-Remove-the-validation-from-the-GUC-check-h.patch
Description: Binary data

v6-0001-Remove-the-validation-from-the-GUC-check-hook-and.patch
Description: Binary data