On Sun, Sep 28, 2025 at 08:28:45PM -0500, David G. Johnston wrote: > On Sunday, September 28, 2025, jian he <[email protected]> wrote: >> Since we already support INCLUDING STORAGE, I’m not sure that >> INCLUDING STORAGE PARAMETER is the right syntax to go with. > > I’d just call it “including parameters”; sure, all of the existing ones are > storage related, but if there were non-storage ones we’d include those as > well, so qualifying with a parameter type doesn’t seem correct.
+1 -- nathan
