On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 12:34:56PM +0100, Mircea Cadariu wrote: > So far so good!
Yes, the buildfarm has not been complaining. > About the main issue, seems to me the consensus is that dropping unnamed > portals more aggressively is the way to go? At the cost of one extra hash table lookup, that unlikely does not matter for performance anyway. I guess so. It's not something that can be backpatched. We need to make sure that the documentation about an unnamed portal drop happening on a follow-up BIND query is fixed. If somebody would like to send a refresh patch, including for how the tests change, that would be welcome here. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
