On Sat, Nov 1, 2025 at 7:14 AM Heikki Linnakangas <[email protected]> wrote: > The patch seems harmless enough to me, no objections to committing it.
Thanks! > However, I'm worried that we'll soon break it again. The new rule is > apparently "include libpq first", but we have no way of enforcing it. Hmm, my meson-fu is weak, but there must surely be some way to declare that you want libpq and have it automatically put things in the right order, will look into that...
