On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 4:32 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > After the attached patch applied, the above messages becomes as > follows. (And index can be built being a bit sparse by fill > factor.) > >> ERROR: index row size 8016 exceeds maximum 7333 for index "y_cube_idx" > > I'm not sure why 277807bd9e didn't do that completely so I may be > missing something. Is there any thoughts?
It seems strange to me that we consider respecting the fillfactor to be more important than letting the operation succeed. I would have thought that the fillfactor would not apply when placing a tuple into a completely empty page. The point of the setting is, of course, to leave some free space available on the page for future tuples, but if the tuples are big enough that only one fits in a page anyway, that's pointless. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
