> On Nov 19, 2025, at 10:00, Chao Li <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Nov 19, 2025, at 02:49, Melanie Plageman <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I no longer remember why I made that patch WIP, so I've removed that
>> designation.
>
> I just reviewed 0007. It removes the second parameter "bool
> skip_recently_used” from SyncOneBuffer. The function is static and is only
> called in one place with skip_recently_used=true, thus removing the parameter
> seems reasonable, and without considering pinned buffer, the function is
> simplified a little bit.
>
> I only got a tiny comment:
> ```
> + * We can make these check without taking the buffer content lock so
> ```
>
> As you changed “this” to “these”, “check” should be changed to “checks”
> accordingly.
>
I just got an compile error:
```
bufmgr.c:3580:33: error: no member named 'dbId' in 'struct CkptSortItem'
3580 | batch.rlocator.dbOid = item.dbId;
| ~~~~ ^
bufmgr.c:3598:13: error: no member named 'dbId' in 'struct CkptSortItem'
3598 | if (item.dbId != batch.rlocator.dbOid)
| ~~~~ ^
2 errors generated.
make[4]: *** [bufmgr.o] Error 1
```
I tried “make clean” and “make” again, which didn’t work. I think the error is
introduced by 0006.
Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/
