On 2025-11-19 12:27:30 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > It's possible, but fundamentally I think it's about replacing > XLogRecPtrIsInvalid with XLogRecPtrIsValid, and what I'm saying is I > wouldn't have chosen to do that. I agree that it would have been > better to do it that way originally, but I disagree with paying the > switching cost, especially in the back-branches.
+1 This just seems like a lot of noise for something at most very mildly odd.
