Re: Add notification on BEGIN ATOMIC SQL functions using temp relations

[Bernice Southey]

Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> No, that's not part of the proposal.  The one case in which we'd
> complain (at an error level TBD) is if a temp table is used to
> define an old-style function's argument or result type
Thank you, I see I was being an idiot.