On Sat, Nov 22, 2025 at 03:26:19AM -0500, Corey Huinker wrote: > I'm open to it, but there was significant pushback to having tight validity > checks on other stats types.
Yeah, I am not sure that there is much value in having strict checks for the values. Some control over the arguments listed in a single object is much more valuable as these are easy to check in the input functions. > The more things that we make errors, the more chances we have to breaking a > dump/restore. Granted, such values should never happen, but odd things do > happen. Indeed. Like the existing import functions, these should not lead to hard failures, but WARNING-level reports. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
