On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 12:52 PM Chao Li <[email protected]> wrote: > V3 looks good to me.
Thanks for reviewing the patch! > > Yeah, I agree that if certain GUCs can break logical replication, > > we should enforce "safe" values, just as we currently do for datestyle. > > And if any other GUCs can cause the issue, they could affect > > postgres_fdw etc, so the fix would need to be broader. > > Just want to clarify if you mean you will handle this in a future patch? I don't currently know of any other parameters that must be forced for logical replication or postgres_fdw. But if we identify any, I'm happy to review a patch that adds the necessary handling. Regards, -- Fujii Masao
