On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 9:58 PM Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 20.11.25 16:00, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> >> 5.
> >>
> >> src/backend/catalog/sql_features.txt
> >>
> >> +G034 Path concatenation YES SQL/PGQ required
> >>
> >> Do we support path concatenation?
> > I don't think so. But let Peter confirm it.
>
> AFAICT, path concatenation just allows that you can write multiple
> element patterns in a row, like ()-[]->(). I don't see how it could
> make sense to not support that.
Yeah, I just took a look at the SQL/PGQ standard
<path concatenation> ::=
<path term> <path factor>
Now I understand, thanks.
--
Regards
Junwang Zhao
