On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 3:46 PM Dilip Kumar <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 4:47 PM shveta malik <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > 3) > > Do we need to have a timestamp column as well to say when conflict was > > recorded? Or local_commit_ts, remote_commit_ts are sufficient? > > Thoughts > > You mean we can record the timestamp now while inserting, not sure if > it will add some more meaningful information than remote_commit_ts, > but let's see what others think. >
local_commit_ts and remote_commit_ts sounds sufficient as one can identify the truth of information from those two. The key/schema values displayed in this table could change later but the information about a particular row is based on the time shown by those two columns. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
