> On 2 Dec 2025, at 08:32, Michael Paquier <[email protected]> wrote:
> Simple example I have seen in the past: a Relation argument not used > (I think there has been at least one such example in tablecmds.c, > whatever). Removing this argument also meant that we don't require > function callers to open a Relation, removing the need to think about > the lock it would require at open. I think this is the really interesting case and the angle to focus on. If we can simplify callers to perhaps even avoid locks then that's a stronger case when considering potential API breaks. It might still be more value in not breaking API, but that would have to be considered on a case by case basis. -- Daniel Gustafsson
