> On Wed, Dec 03, 2025 at 02:27:29PM -0600, Sami Imseih wrote: > > There are probably other good reasons to allow a generic argument > > to the init callback. Besides the lwlock name, I can see someone > > wanting to pass some other initialization info that may vary > > depending on extension GUCs, etc. > > The value of a GUC could be obtained in the callback via the global > variable or GetConfigOption(), right?
Yes, that's true. It will be hard to find other good use-cases that can't be solved with a global variable, but we can also say this is a low-cost change, so why not just do it. -- Sami
