On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 11:34 PM Mihail Nikalayeu <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, everyone! > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 3:41 PM Álvaro Herrera <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think it's odd that conflict resolution depends on log entries. I > > think it would be much more valuable if conflict reporting would save > > the details of the conflict to some kind of conflict logging table. > > How exactly are we expecting that users would bring the data from the > > log file to a database row, when they are to be merged? What happens if > > there are bytea columns in the table? > > Such a proposal exists already at [0]. >
Thanks for providing the information. > Also, sorry for being noisy and a little-bit offtopic but I think it > is a good moment to highlight the fact that such messages are also not > so useful because sometimes they are just clearly incorrect... > You may find details and reproducers at [1] and [2]. > Yes, I am aware of those, but IIRC, those are due to the traditional design choice of using DirtySnapshot during the apply-phase of logical replication. We need to discuss that separately and come to a conclusion. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
