Thank you for the review! On Thu, Dec 4, 2025 at 9:15 AM Masahiko Sawada <[email protected]> wrote: > I've attached a small change to simplify the 0001 patch. Please review it.
LGTM, and I've updated in v9 patches. > Here are a few comments: > > + <listitem> > + <para> > + <literal>manual</literal>: The analyze was started by an explicit > > For consistency with "started_by" in pg_stat_progress_vacuum, I think > it's better to start with "The operation was started by". I think "started_by" in pg_stat_progress_vacuum uses "The vacuum was started by ...". > --- > + <command>ANALYZE</command> or <command>VACUUM (ANALYZE)</command> > + command. > > How about using "... or VACUUM with the ANALYZE option"? Agreed, I've fixed it. -- Best regards, Shinya Kato NTT OSS Center
v9-0001-Add-mode-and-started_by-columns-to-pg_stat_progre.patch
Description: Binary data
v9-0002-Add-started_by-column-to-pg_stat_progress_analyze.patch
Description: Binary data
