On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 04:16:45PM +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote: > Hello. > > > Just my 2 cents: that was a hacky use case for development reasons. > > I know. So I intended to preserve the parameter with default of 100% if no > one strongly objects to preserve. Then I abandoned that since I had:p
So, are we going to output a notice if a non-100% fill factor is specified? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
