On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 01:27:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > This requires a catversion bump, for which it may seem a bit late; > > however I think it's better to release pg11 without a useless catalog > > column only to remove it in pg12 ... > > Catversion bumps during beta are routine. If we had put out rc1 > I'd say it was too late, but we have not. > > If we do do a bump for beta4, I'd be strongly tempted to address the > lack of a unique index for pg_constraint as well, cf > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/10110.1535907...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Uh, if we add a unique index later, wouldn't that potentially cause future restores to fail? Seems we better add it now. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
