On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 12:37 PM Peter Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > Here is a completely different idea. This may solve the immediate > problem re the replication of the Conflict Log Table (CLT) at least... > > 0. AFAIK, anything named with a "pg_" prefix generally means that the > named thing is intended for PG internal use, right? > > 1. So, the CLT should be automatically named to have a "pg_" prefix, > indicating that it really is an internal table, albeit not a system > catalog. IIRC, this kind of name was a recent suggestion anyhow. >
We would also like to give user a provision to provide conflict_table|conflict_log name. In general also, I am not sure if assuming this is a good idea as there could be some other internal table if not now then in future where we would like to allow replication by default. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
