On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 5:11 AM Jacob Champion <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 1:08 PM David G. Johnston > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Presently it’s the same criteria as for the code - things deemed bug fixes > > get back-patched; pure enhancements do not. > > Well, okay. Bear with me a moment because I need to calibrate to the > community norms. > > Is the consensus that this is not a "bug fix"? Because I know what the > feature does, but I cannot understand the current paragraph without > rereading it several times. >
As OP, do I get a vote? FWIW, I think that the purpose of documentation is surely to convey information *clearly* to users. And, the original text fails the clarity test because it was simply too hard to understand what it was trying to say without reading it multiple times. And, things that fail tests are called "bugs". ====== Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia
