"=?ISO-8859-1?B?emVuZ21hbg==?=" <[email protected]> writes: > I've noticed this interesting feature and would like to modify this test case > to clarify that we fall back to the original logic when inlining fails. > This is a small change that doesn't touch core code. What do you all think?
I think this looks like a waste of test cycles. AFAICS it won't add
even a single line of code coverage for inline_function_in_from().
Why do you think we need it?
regards, tom lane
