> On Dec 25, 2025, at 19:13, cca5507 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c
> b/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c
> index 469397e7344..1229e22e78a 100644
> --- a/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c
> +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c
> @@ -1077,7 +1077,7 @@ continue_page:
> ItemId lpp;
> OffsetNumber lineoff;
>
> - Assert(lineindex <= scan->rs_ntuples);
> + Assert(lineindex < scan->rs_ntuples);
> lineoff = scan->rs_vistuples[lineindex];
> lpp = PageGetItemId(page, lineoff);
> Assert(ItemIdIsNormal(lpp));
>
> The lineindex is 0-based, so it should be '<' rather than '<=', thoughts?
>
> --
> Regards,
> ChangAo Chen
> <v1-0001-Fix-incorrect-assertion-in-heapgettup_pagemode.patch>
Good catch. The function comment clearly mentions that lineindex is 0 based.
```
* tuples listed in rs_vistuples[] rather than all tuples on the page. Notice
* that lineindex is 0-based, where the corresponding loop variable lineoff in
* heapgettup is 1-based.
* ----------------
*/
static void
heapgettup_pagemode(HeapScanDesc scan,
ScanDirection dir,
int nkeys,
ScanKey key)
{
HeapTuple tuple = &(scan->rs_ctup);
Page page;
uint32 lineindex;
uint32 linesleft;
```
So, the fix looks correct.
Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/
