Hello hackers,
24.09.2025 09:31, Michael Banck wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 11:30:00PM +0300, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
Maybe I was wrong and we can at least categorize these failures -- I hope
their number is finite, but my point was that it's hardly possible to use
the information, that fruitcrow gives us, to improve Postgres.
Or, for that matter, to improve GNU Mach/Hurd...
Another three months later, we can see all the fruitcrow failures
counted (113 so far) at:
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Known_Buildfarm_Test_Failures
with the following main categories:
1) test_shm_mq times out on Hurd animal fruitcrow due to OS issue
2) pg_stat_statements/entry_timestamp.sql failed due to zero time diff on Hurd
animal fruitcrow
3) multiple-row-versions.spec fails on Hurd animal due to OS issue
4) Miscellaneous tests fail on on Hurd animal due to invalid signal received
(and a few assorted failures)
I think it doesn't make much sense to keep tracking/sorting all the
failures produced by fruitcrow, so I'm going to just filter them out until
new Hurd release.
Best regards,
Alexander