so 3. 1. 2026 v 13:23 odesílatel Marcos Pegoraro <[email protected]> napsal:
> Em sáb., 3 de jan. de 2026 às 03:35, Pavel Stehule < > [email protected]> escreveu: > >> here is a patch (with small regress test) >> > > An anonymous block doesn't accept vacuum too. > Wouldn't it be better to specify what kind of block you are running > instead of > function, procedure or anonymous block ? > It is correct, but maybe too long. Generally, there is a term "routine" as a synonym for "function, procedure or any stored procedure code", but I am not sure how much is accepted by the community > regards > Marcos >
