2026년 1월 9일 (금) AM 9:25, Michael Paquier <[email protected]>님이 작성:

> On Mon, Dec 08, 2025 at 12:09:58PM +0000, Pavlo Golub wrote:
> > Virtual transaction IDs are fundamental to PostgreSQL's transaction
> > tracking,
> > appearing in pg_locks.virtualtransaction, log output via %v placeholder,
> and
> > internal transaction management. However, there's currently no direct SQL
> > function to retrieve the current VXID, forcing applications to query
> > pg_locks
> > or parse log files to obtain this information.
>
> This is replacing one SQL in a given session by another, as a session
> currently running a transaction can query itself pg_locks and match an
> entry with its own pg_backend_pid().  Hence I don't see the need for
> this function, except simplicity in retrieving a session's state with
> less characters typed at the end?
>

I see this as a tradeoff between minor convenience and negligible
addition cost.

The community should decide whether this tradeoff is worth it.


> Thoughts and opinions from others are welcome.  I'm always OK to be
> outvoted.
> --
> Michael
>

Best regards,
Henson Choi

Reply via email to