Hi, Kirill
On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 at 17:46, Kirill Reshke <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 at 17:44, Roman Khapov <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> > I agree — the NULL handling seems wrong. >> > Here's a quick patch to fix it. What do you think? >> >> LGTM, but maybe the test should be expanded with NULL for the two-column >> indexes? I mean to add NULLs at zero column too. >> >> Also, about the tests but not related to NULLs... >> Seems like we need to run those tests on 32bit system, the test output >> should be different? > > Yes, gin_1.out is for 32-bit output. Adding new tuples in relation > will result in binary layout changes, so we need to update gin.out for > 64 bit and gin_1.out for 32 bit > I only have a 64-bit system to work with. I'm unsure how to produce the correct gin_1.out file for 32-bit architecture while running on 64-bit. Any advice or recommended workflow would be greatly appreciated! -- Regards, Japin Li ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co., Ltd.
