On 20.01.26 17:38, Andres Freund wrote:
I have split your first patch further.  For a start, I left out the
PG_MODULE_MAGIC*-related changes and disabled the module under MSVC. This
has been committed.  I plan to let the buildfarm run with it for a day or
two and then add in the basic MSVC support.
Seems like billbug doesn't like this:

https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl? nm=billbug&dt=2026-01-20%2016%3A00%3A02

gmake[1]: Entering directory 
'/home/marcel/build-farm-20/buildroot/HEAD/pgsql.build/src/test/modules/test_cplusplusext'
g++ -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wendif-labels -Wmissing-format-attribute 
-Wimplicit-fallthrough=3 -Wcast-function-type -Wshadow=compatible-local 
-Wformat-security -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -fexcess-precision=standard -g 
-O2 -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -I. -I. 
-I../../../../src/include -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112L -D__EXTENSIONS__ 
-D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS  -I/usr/openssl/3/include -I/usr/include/libxml2     
-c -o test_cplusplusext.o test_cplusplusext.cpp
In file included from ../../../../src/include/postgres.h:48,
                  from test_cplusplusext.cpp:18:
../../../../src/include/c.h:158:21: error: '_Noreturn' does not name a type; 
did you mean 'pg_noreturn'?
   158 | #define pg_noreturn _Noreturn
       |                     ^~~~~~~~~
../../../../src/include/c.h:918:1: note: in expansion of macro 'pg_noreturn'
   918 | pg_noreturn extern void ExceptionalCondition(const char *conditionName,
       | ^~~~~~~~~~~

It's getting confused by _Noreturn, which is defined thus:

#if defined(__STDC_VERSION__) && __STDC_VERSION__ >= 201112L
#define pg_noreturn _Noreturn

But apparently on these Solaris-related platforms, g++ defines __STDC_VERSION__ even in C++ mode. (Confirmed in local testing.) Apparently, this is even allowed by the C++ standard.

So the smallest fix is probably to gate this more like this:

#if (defined(__STDC_VERSION__) && __STDC_VERSION__ >= 201112L) && !defined(__cplusplus)
#define pg_noreturn _Noreturn

(Eventually, we could add support for C++ attributes, but one step at a time.)



Reply via email to