Jacob Champion <[email protected]> writes:
> This is a tiny followup to https://postgr.es/c/0664aa4ff8 that
> enshrines the unused 3.1 protocol version as PG_PROTOCOL_RSRV31. The
> patch comes from [1]; I just wanted to give people the opportunity to
> bikeshed the name (or object to the move?) before it becomes part of a
> public header.
+1 for concept, but I agree the name needs bikeshedding. "RSRV"
is unreadable, and people might well mentally expand it to
something involving "server", leading to confusion.
How about "PG_PROTOCOL_RESERVED_31" or
"PG_PROTOCOL_UNUSED_31"?
regards, tom lane
