Hi zengman, On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 10:37 PM zengman <[email protected]> wrote:
> > This indicates that for the test case at offnum == 36, the error message > should report "offset 43" (the successor), not "offset 36" (the current > tuple). > However, when I updated the test expectation from \d+ wildcard to the > exact value offset 43, the test fails. > This makes me wonder whether the current code in verify_heapam.c (lines > 777, 793, 799) should be using nextoffnum instead of ctx.offnum. > > Fully agreed. I think there's no need to modify the expectations. Seems the 0002 patch alone is sufficient.
