Please take me off this list.
> On Sep 14, 2018, at 05:31, Chris Travers <chris.trav...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 10:53 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us > <mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>> wrote: > I wrote: > > Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net <mailto:sfr...@snowman.net>> writes: > >> We seem to be a bit past that timeline... Do we have any update on when > >> this will be moving forward? > >> Or did I miss something? > > > Nope, you didn't. Folks have been on holiday which made it hard to keep > > forward progress going, particularly with respect to selecting the initial > > committee members. Now that Magnus is back on shore, I hope we can > > wrap it up quickly --- say by the end of August. > > I apologize for the glacial slowness with which this has all been moving. > The core team has now agreed to some revisions to the draft CoC based on > the comments in this thread; see > > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Code_of_Conduct > <https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Code_of_Conduct> > > (That's the updated text, but you can use the diff tool on the page > history tab to see the changes from the previous draft.) > > I really have to object to this addition: > "This Code is meant to cover all interaction between community members, > whether or not it takes place within postgresql.org <http://postgresql.org/> > infrastructure, so long as there is not another Code of Conduct that takes > precedence (such as a conference's Code of Conduct)." > > That covers things like public twitter messages over live political > controversies which might not be personally directed. At least if one is > going to go that route, one ought to *also* include a safe harbor for > non-personally-directed discussions of philosophy, social issues, and > politics. Otherwise, I think this is asking for trouble. See, for example, > what happened with Opalgate and how this could be seen to encourage use of > this to silence political controversies unrelated to PostgreSQL. > > I think we are about ready to announce the initial membership of the > CoC committee, as well, but that should be a separate post. > > regards, tom lane > > > > -- > Best Wishes, > Chris Travers > > Efficito: Hosted Accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor > lock-in. > http://www.efficito.com/learn_more <http://www.efficito.com/learn_more>
