On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 8:30 AM Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I don't think removing it entirely from all back branches is a good
> > idea, without first making sure that there are no users.
>
> Agreed, we can't pull it from the back branches.  But I'm in favor of
> pulling it from HEAD if we document how to use PAM-based RADIUS
> instead.  I agree with Thomas' argument that the cost-benefit ratio
> of fixing our implementation would be poor.

+1.

I still think a WARNING in the back branches would be a kindness, to
let people know that they need to move.

--Jacob


Reply via email to