Michael Paquier <[email protected]> writes:
> Should any of these be backpatched, actually? Based on the lack of
> complaints, it does not seem so to me, but if we are targetting a
> backpatch of the AIX port, that would be required.
There's no plan to backpatch the AIX port ... but if we can clean
up this include-path mess not too invasively, I think it might be
a good idea to back-patch that much. I'm concerned that confusion
between <float.h> and utils/float.h might be a problem on other
platforms too.
regards, tom lane
