Hi,

On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 03:46:35PM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 11:38:51AM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> > Seems reasonable to me.  While it's only a test module, folks might use it
> > as a starting point for their own module, so IMHO it's worth setting a good
> > example.  I'll wait for a couple, but otherwise I'll go commit this soon.
> 
> Committed. 

Thanks!

> I ended up moving the new line to the background worker registration
> loop so that we can add the worker number to the name, too.

Oh right, I missed that one.


Michael


Reply via email to