> On 11 Feb 2026, at 20:24, Zsolt Parragi <[email protected]> wrote:
> Not sure if this is the best way to handle it or not, but it seems the
> cleanest to me, as the SASL code already had these return codes and
> this way the patch doesn't introduce anything OAuth specific to the
> logic.
Off the cuff this seems reasonable from technical standpoint. However, is the
below message of LOG level interest to an admin?
+ ereport(LOG,
+ errmsg("OAuth issuer discovery requested by user \"%s\"",
Is this valuable to administrators in production, or should this perhaps be a
DEBUGx level logging?
--
Daniel Gustafsson
