On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 at 18:41, Richard Guo <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 3:47 AM Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'd probably write the increments as ++ rather than += 1 but I'm not > > sure if everyone would agree. > > I'm a fan of ++ as well, so I agree. > > Thanks > Richard > > > Looking at this patch and the idea altogether I have other thoughts on this now. Thinking about the original problem of having a count of total idle in transaction time, seems unnecessary with the availability of state_change timestamp along with state columns in pg_stat_activity. -- Regards, Rafia Sabih CYBERTEC PostgreSQL International GmbH
