On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 10:37:43AM +0800, Xuneng Zhou wrote: > WaitForWALToBecomeAvailable can also return XLREAD_WOULDBLOCK when the > caller set nonblocking. The comment only talks about XLREAD_FAIL vs > “waits in standby,” so it still doesn’t describe that third outcome. > That omission pre-dates this patch, should we expand the comment > mention the nonblocking case as well?
The outcome related to XLREAD_WOULDBLOCK is implied in the last sentence of the comment block standing at the top of the function, which seems OK to me. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
