On 24.02.26 22:07, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> writes:
It appears so, but then I think we should update the documentation along
the lines I showed, because I found it misleading about this.  New
docs-only patch attached.

+1 for being more explicit here, but that specific wording reads a
little awkwardly to me.  What do you think of the attached?

Sounds good, thanks.




Reply via email to