On Mon, Mar 02, 2026 at 10:13:38AM +0800, jinbinge wrote: > "0123456789ABCDEFabcdef". This change would be purely cosmetic with > no behavioral impact, but would eliminate the unnecessary > duplication.
That's entirely cosmetic, well why not.. There is also a 01234567890ABCDEF in src/bin/pg_upgrade/controldata.c. Perhaps we could sanitize the whole as of 0123456789ABCDEF, which is larger in trend compared to 1234567890ABCDEF when it comes to the C code, not the tests. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
