On 3/3/26 5:13 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2026 at 04:39:43AM +0100, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
Shouldn't the patch have used repalloc_array()? If the code had done so in
the first place the bug would never have happened.

I was considering that first.  However, after looked at the
MemoryContextAlloc() and the inconsistency that repalloc_array() was
bringing, I have turned the thought away.

Ah, makes sense but then the question is if we should make MemoryContextAlloc() more consistent with palloc() but that is a bigger question than just this small bugfix.

Andreas



Reply via email to