On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 2:14 PM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
> afaict for deferrable READ ONLY DEFERRABLE transactions we could > trivially allow parallelism? Am I missing something? I think you are right. What's more, DEFERRABLE transactions seem very likely to be cases where parallelism would be especially beneficial. Will take care of it. -- Kevin Grittner VMware vCenter Server https://www.vmware.com/
