Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> writes: > On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 4:06 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Why would we fix it rather than just removing it?
> I assumed we wouldn't remove an extern C function extension code > somewhere might use. Though admittedly I'd be surprised if anyone > used this one. Unless it looks practical to support this behavior in the Windows and SysV cases, I think we should get rid of it rather than expend effort on supporting it for just some platforms. regards, tom lane