Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 4:06 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Why would we fix it rather than just removing it?

> I assumed we wouldn't remove an extern C function extension code
> somewhere might use.  Though admittedly I'd be surprised if anyone
> used this one.

Unless it looks practical to support this behavior in the Windows
and SysV cases, I think we should get rid of it rather than expend
effort on supporting it for just some platforms.

                        regards, tom lane

Reply via email to