On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 11:45 AM Alexander Kuzmenkov <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 11:09 PM Heikki Linnakangas <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 for initializing all padding in WAL records. In fact I thought that > > we already did that. (Except in this case, apparently) > > I found 42 exceptions like this. See the attached patch, it > initializes some WAL records and removes the WAL-related Valgrind > suppressions. The regression tests pass under Valgrind with these > changes.
I think I'm making some unneeded changes here though. For example in ginxlogInsertListPage for a two-int struct with no padding. I'll need to check them again one by one.
