On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 2:10 PM Nazir Bilal Yavuz <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Wed, 11 Mar 2026 at 15:19, KAZAR Ayoub <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2026, 12:36 PM Nazir Bilal Yavuz <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> 0002 has an attempt to remove some branches from SIMD code but since > >> it is kind of functional change, I wanted to attach that as another > >> patch. I think we can apply some parts of this, if not all. > > > > 0002 sounds really good to have, haven't measured the diff but it's very > logical. > > I agree with you. I saw very small speedups like 1%-2% but I think > changes make sense regardless of the performance improvement. > > > Another quick question though, do we need USE_NO_SIMD for any reason? I > just remembered that there's some simd paths like json that don't use it. > > vector8_eq() and vector8_highbit_mask() don't have non-SIMD > implementations, so we need to use USE_NO_SIMD. > Aha ! that's true, thanks. Regards, Ayoub
