> On 12 Mar 2026, at 08:57, Jakub Wartak <[email protected]> wrote:

> ..I think that the topic of removal 32-bit support deserves better 
> transparency,
> so I'm sending this under new subject.


My interpretation of the comments in the thread was to remove 32-bit support
for 8 byte single-copy atomicity, not 32-bit support entirely.  Maybe that was
a misunderstanding but it seems like a better place to start given that it
apparently doesn't work with no one complaining about it.

--
Daniel Gustafsson



Reply via email to