On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 9:50 AM Michael Paquier <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 11:35:48PM +0800, Xuneng Zhou wrote: > > Our io_time metric currently measures only read time and ignores write > > I/O, which can be misleading. We now separate it into read_time and > > write_time. > > I had a look at the pgstatindex part this morning, running my own test > under conditions similar to 6c228755add8, and here's one extract with > io_uring: > pgstatindex (100k tuples) base=32938.2ms patch=83.3ms 395.60x ( 99.7%) > (reads=2745->173, io_time=32932.09->59.75ms)
This result looks great! > There was one issue with a declaration put in the middle of the code, > that I have fixed. This one is now done, remains 3 pieces to > evaluate. Thanks for fixing this and for taking the time to review and test the patches. -- Best, Xuneng
