Hello hackers,
As recent failures from greenfly, e.g. [1], show:
--- /home/gburd/build/HEAD/pgsql/contrib/pgcrypto/expected/crypt-des.out
2026-03-13 18:06:10.669824704 +0000
+++
/home/gburd/build/HEAD/pgsql.build/testrun/pgcrypto/regress/results/crypt-des.out
2026-03-13 18:38:39.830105127 +0000
@@ -4,13 +4,13 @@
SELECT crypt('', 'NB');
crypt
---------------
- NBPx/38Y48kHg
+ NB3TsPvodZDgs
(1 row)
adding -march=rv64gcv to CFLAGS makes clang generate different (wrong?)
code for crypt-des.c. Namely, having reproduced the diff locally, with
this debugging addition:
--- a/contrib/pgcrypto/crypt-des.c
+++ b/contrib/pgcrypto/crypt-des.c
@@ -355,6 +355,11 @@ des_init(void)
for (i = 0; i < 32; i++)
un_pbox[pbox[i] - 1] = i;
+fprintf(stderr, "!!!des_init| un_pbox:");
+ for (i = 0; i < 32; i++)
+ fprintf(stderr, " %d", un_pbox[i]);
+fprintf(stderr, "\n");
+
for (b = 0; b < 4; b++)
I can see the following during a normal execution of:
CREATE EXTENSION pgcrypto; SELECT crypt('', 'NB');
crypt
---------------
NBPx/38Y48kHg
!!!des_init| un_pbox: 8 16 22 30 12 27 1 17 23 15 29 5 25 19 9 0 7 13 24 2 3 28
10 18 31 11 21 6 4 26 14 20
vs:
crypt
---------------
NB3TsPvodZDgs
!!!des_init| un_pbox: 15 6 19 20 28 11 27 16 0 14 22 25 4 17 30 9 1 7 23 13 31
26 2 8 18 12 29 5 21 10 3 24
when the code compiled with CC=clang-20 CPPFLAGS="-march=rv64gcv".
I don't observe this issue with gcc-14, nor with this modification (using
clang-20, -march=rv64gcv):
for (i = 0; i < 32; i++)
+{
un_pbox[pbox[i] - 1] = i;
+pg_compiler_barrier();
+}
[1]
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=greenfly&dt=2026-03-13%2018%3A06%3A09
Best regards,
Alexander
