On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 4:51 AM Michael Paquier <[email protected]> wrote: > > The trick with this patch is to make sure that all the relevant places > where data is sent downstream are correctly incremented. >
Right. > As far as I > can see, things seem to be covered, but I cannot help but wonder if we > are missing one or more places. @Amit, do you feel a hole somewhere? > Yesterday, I raised a point related to this which is whether we want to count messages like keep_alive, copy_done, or PqReplMsg_PrimaryStatusUpdate? These don't contain the user decoded data from WAL but some additional information between publisher-subscriber required to ensure data is being applied. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
