On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 10:16:58PM -0700, Haibo Yan wrote: > I have not read the code yet, so this may already be answered there, > but I had a question about the proposal itself. This patch protects > against a missing backup_label, but what about a wrong one? If a > user restores a backup_label file from a different backup, the > existence check alone would not detect that. Do we need some > consistency check between the returned pg_control copy and the > backup_label contents, or is the intended scope here limited to the > “missing file” case only?
Please note that we use bottom-posting on the lists, as of: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Bottom-posting -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
