Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Ok, committed. > > Thoughts on backpatching? Seems like a straightforward bug fix.
Thanks for pushing the patch! I thought it was not a candidate for backpatching because it's a collation change. Now, to have a problem with that change in a minor release, a user would need to have an ICU collation with a rule containing "[strength N]", where N<>3, even though it was ineffective (so either the user did not notice or they did but kept it nonetheless). Users who reported the problem hoped for a backpatch, but we cannot say there is zero risk with that change in a minor release. Personally I'm +0. Best regards, -- Daniel Vérité https://postgresql.verite.pro/
