> On 19 Mar 2026, at 10:55, Zsolt Parragi <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Isn't pg_hosts.conf a really (too) generic name for this >> feature? > > My question earlier about a different key=value format (json5?), was > related to this, but approached it from a different direction: maybe > it could be more generic in the future, supporting different settings, > maybe even in an extensible way? With the current SNI handling already > relates to multi tenancy, and allowing custom per hosts settings would > move in the same direction.
Introducing a new config format is for sure an interesting idea, but it's a much bigger body of work which needs it's own discussion and patchset, it should not be as part of another feature. -- Daniel Gustafsson
